Saturday, March 9, 2013

A Response to the Blog by the Catholic League about SNAP

A classmate of too-many-years-ago-to mention forwarded me an email of the "Latest News Release" (in effect a blog) by William  Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights [CLRCR], titled, "SNAP Is in Panic Mode." SNAP is Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests.The full article is at:
http://www.catholicleague.org/snap-is-in-panic-mode/

Donohue's article is the kind of writing that just gets my dander up. And I'm not sure which I'm more upset about: the content of the CLRCR "news release" or the forwarding of this blog by my very intelligent classmate to our class email list. I was hoping that one of my class would formulate a commentary in response to the article. But since none have responded yet, I suppose I can start the discussion by sharing this with youand themin the form of an email response:

Aw, Bill, please don't be taken in by the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, which considers itself "more Catholic than the Pope" and might be considered the Catholic equivalent of the check-out counter rumors-gossip-innuendo magazine The Star.
Even just a quick perusal of the Catholic League's website tells the story. And the Wikipedia essay on the organization is equally enlightening.

The Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests is doing a great service. While I didn't care for SNAP's use of the term "dirty dozen" to describe "cover-up" hierarchy, I was glad to see that their staff offered this apology for their use of the term:
We sincerely apologize for offending anyone by using the phrase "dirty dozen."
We are a staff of three abuse victims working very hard to protect kids, help victims, expose wrongdoers and deter cover ups in a huge, powerful, global institution. We simply are incapable of monitoring how a 40 year old movie title translates into multiple languages and a slang expression.

That being said, there are so many important concerns facing the "administrators" as they enter the conclave.
For first-world cardinals, these include the flight from faith by younger Catholics, loss of confidence in the church, the clergy sex abuse crisis and how to handle such controversial social issues as the place of women, homosexuality, gay marriage, abortion, divorce and remarriage, and the decline in priests.
For cardinals from the developing world, social justice, poverty, environmental issues and relations with Islam and other faiths take centre stage. For both groups, the government of the church and reform of the Curia have risen sharply up the agenda. 

It's good to hear, even if it's just a rumor, that Cardinal George is active in comments about cardinals with a "past." You probably saw the news item in the Tribune.
source:

SNAP's comment:
In a new interview with the Chicago Tribune, Cardinal George says that Cardinals are ‘vetting’ one another on abuse and cover up. If he is correct about this – and we hope he is – we are encouraged. But such vetting should go beyond just likely papal candidates. It should be vigorously expanded to include all church officials.
source:

The point is that "It's about the children."

On the other hand, as the Wikipedia article indicates, the Catholic League's Donohue has a history of "defending priests against accusations of child sexual abuse."

If it comes down to a choice between SNAP and the CLRCR, for my part, the children win my support.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

It's About The Children, The Holy Spirit Knows


As we enter this period of "sede vacante" at the Vatican, a friend of mine shared an  "Open Letter" last week with our group.

Her message brought to mind the many forms of abuse and violence being revealed in the news about the actions of official members of the Church--especially in the sexual abuse of children over the years.

What she wrote moved me to send a "Letter to the Editor" at the Hartford Courant. That letter, admittedly a plagiarized edit of Judy's email with her gracious permission, was published March 3rd.
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/letters/hcrs-12758hc--20130227,0,5135814.story

Here is her email. My commentary follows it:
Dear Laity & Priests,
It is time. We have experienced over ten years of ongoing revelations of clergy sex abuse scandals involving the rape of children, the protection of pedophiles, and the conspiracy of cover-up by bishops around the globe.
We have a pope who, as head of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, was the key person responsible for every abuse case reported.
We have Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahoney, clearly exposed in clergy sex abuse cover up activity, and now Scottish Cardinal Keith O’Brien whose resignation has been accepted early amid allegations by four priests of inappropriate behavior.
First, I would like to commend the four priests in Scotland for reporting to the Vatican their experiences. Those “inappropriate actions” were examples of abuse; sexual harassment at the least, perhaps assault—and definitely abuse of authority. It took great courage to report this man, and I am sorry for the pain it has caused them. It is the systemic dysfunctional clericalism within the Roman Catholic priesthood that has destroyed any sense of integrity that may have been present and more importantly prohibits any real integrity to flourish.
It is time for the laity and the priests to assume responsibility for our part in this disgraceful reality.
Our sin is complacency. But it can be forgiven quickly and sincerely if apologies are made, accompanied with action.
1.     Provide a safe and welcoming environment which encourages and even urges all victims of clergy sex abuse to come forward.

2.     Provide a safe and welcoming environment which encourages and urges all priests and seminarians, past and present, former or currently working, to come forward and name the bishops who violated them through sexual harassment or abuse.

3.     Recognize that within the priesthood there is a certain percentage of the population that is gay. Also recognize that while celibacy is a vow taken at ordination it is not necessarily a gift given or call heard by each priest. It is an unfortunate mandatory requirement at this time. Require any priests weather gay or straight, who are living double lives, to come forward. Let us tackle the issues of celibacy, homosexuality and sexuality and equality. It is time.

4.     Priests and Laity hold public rallies and press conferences proclaiming apologies to victims while holding signed letters and petitions to our bishops stating that we will not financially support the diocese until the following things occur:
a.     Public listing of all priests credibly accused by lay persons
b.     Public listing of every bishop reported of harassment or abuse by priests.
c.      Release of all records showing any cover-up of pedophiles or other abuses of authority.
d.     Full financial disclosure of the diocese
It is time.
The truth and only the truth will set us free! Be not afraid.
Judy Lorenz

Great rallying statement, Judy! You've provided material that could be edited down to 200 words as "Letter to the Editor" today for newspapers across the country seeking counterpoint to the saccharin-sweet "We'll Miss You" messages on "B16 End Day."

What are daunting are the various forms of inertia apparently plaguing even those who term themselves "progressive Catholics." With all the ubiquitous Catholic reform organizations around the world, one would think that the message of your "OMG!" would be heard "from the housetops" of the media in all languages. Seems the outrage of the progressive element even just here in the U.S. was missed in the poll results in the USA Today article "U.S. Catholics Split on Church Direction Under New Pope" on Feb 21st:
Looking back over Benedict's papacy, U.S. Catholics are overall pleased with the work he has done. However, his favorability rating isn't as high as its peak of 83% right after his papal visit to the United States in April 2008.
About 74% of U.S. Catholics polled express a favorable view of Benedict, 85, who served eight years as pope. Benedict was a staunch conservative when it came to church teachings, but brought about many technology changes to modernize the church. He tweets from an iPad, has a Facebook page and provides Vatican news from a YouTube channel.
Pope Benedict's ratings have never soared as high as his predecessor Pope John Paul II, who was rated favorably by 90% of U.S. Catholics in three separate Pew Research polls in the 1980s and 1990s.
U.S. Catholics are united on some fronts. Most give Benedict negative ratings for his handling of the sex-abuse scandal in the church. Among Catholics who say they followed news of the pontiff's resignation, 63% are displeased with how he addressed the sex-abuse scandal, while 33% give him positive ratings. These ratings are significantly more negative than in April 2008. [emphasis mine]


Seems those who want to respond to the "OMG!" and other calls for church reform have their work cut for them with those of the 33% as well with those other 4% who, I'm guessing, "don't know".


Seems those who want to respond to the "OMG!" and other calls for church reform have their work cut for them with those of the 33% as well with those other 4% who, I'm guessing, "don't know".
In addition to the children, there are so many voiceless who have suffered what Judy outlines in her email at the hands of the men in charge of the Church who see themselves as powerful and forget the message of the Gospel Jesus.

One cannot but wonder how all good Catholic people haven't risen up in an outrage and a call to action akin to that expressed in Judy's email. The Catholic Church—or better, the people of God—have certainly responded with outrage to past situations with action. 

The unfortunate alternative to inaction is the blessing for the Czar offered by the Rabbi in Fiddler on the Roof which we might apply to the new pope: "May the Lord bless and keep him. . . as far away as possible!" or at least far enough away to let God's Spirit truly have free reign. If the Holy Spirit were in charge and being heeded by our church administrators, the abusers of children and the other voiceless would have received justice instead of cover-ups. After all, as I always say: The Holy Spirit knows what she's doing!