Monday, July 7, 2014

Pope Francis, the Mafia and the Vatican Bank: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of the Use of Power

Those who in their lives follow this path of evil, as mafiosi do, are not in communion with God. They are excommunicated.
                                                                                                                        –-Pope Francis, June 25, 2014 

He told the crowd: "This evil must be fought against, it must be pushed aside. We must say no to it."
He branded the 'Ndrangheta as the "adoration of evil and contempt of the common good" and said the Church would exert its full force in efforts to combat organised crime.
Source:   http://news.yahoo.com/mafiosi-excommunicated-pope-says-151122053.html

The sensation of this "informal excommunication" of the Sicilian mafia by Francis has now abated in the normal news cycle. But while it was “hot,” it was getting more publicity than the vindication of Galileo by John Paul II on November 4, 1992.
Despite it's not even being “latae sentitiae," the “excommunication” Francis forthrightly declared is being reported out of context. For instance, the media ignore that Francis had words for the mafioso earlier in March, 2014 [see March, 2014, in the timeline below].
And even the June confrontation of the mafioso by Francis is part of larger campaign for justice. In a larger world-wide context, Francis’ words for the mafia are a call to all institutions who use intimidation for the exercise of power, even the Church.

On the other hand, commentators haven’t picked up on the point of interest to most history buffs. Francis's condemnation of the mafia this month is but one small vignette of a long series of events stretching over the pontificate of at least five popes. These events reflect the love-hate relationship of the Vatican with those who would use the Instituto per le Opere di Religione, the formal name of the Vatican Bank, for money laundering by mafia and others.

I.     THE GOOD

THE GOOD WORKS OF THE IOR
At the outset, this “Spat” goes contrary to its normal attitude by making clear this is some good in all this. Despite the sordid history outlined in the chronology below, the history of the good works carried out through the Institute for the Works of Religion shows all is not so black. For instance, in July, 2012, one report states that $70 million dollars was donated to various causes:
The Vatican Bank, officially called the Institute for the Works of Religion, distributed its charitable funds among the Amazon Fund; the Pro-Orantibus Fund, which supports cloistered monasteries; the San Sergio Fund, which supports the Church in the former Soviet Union; and the Commission for Latin America, as well as other Catholic charities.

That being stated, we continue

II.     THE BAD

A CHRONOLOGY OF THE IOR and THE ROLE OF THE MAFIA
The second point can be put in perspective by a review of history of the Istituto per le Opere di Religione [IOR or Institute for Religious Works], the formal name of the Vatican Bank. One new report cites some of that history:
The Vatican Bank was established with a massive sum provided by the dictator Benito Mussolini in “payment” for the loss of Papal-owned territories 60 years earlier, when the inhabitants of those territories decided they would rather be part of a united Italy than continue to be ruled directly by the Pope.  Its first director, a brilliant but unscrupulous financier named Bernardino Nogara, used those funds and others to control a substantial portion of Italian economic life, including the ownership of several banks, munitions factories, and Italy’s largest manufacturer of the contraceptive devices that were officially banned by the Church.  The Church’s insatiable demand for funds, particularly to finance its attempts to influence European politics in the postwar era, led the Bank to seek even greater profits by plunging into organized crime: evading Italian currency laws, laundering Mafia drug profits, and serving as a front for fraudulent securities schemes.  

A little research yielded this sketchy timeline to illustrate the connection between the recent condemnation of the mafia by Francis and the machinations of the 
mafia with the Vatican Bank:

June 27, 1942 - Pius XII founds the Istituto per le Opere di Religione. The present website states:  Our mission is to serve the universal Church throughout the entire world, helping the Holy See, religious congregations and Catholic institutions in their works of charity and evangelization.
More about the purpose of the IOR and its ongoing process of reform started in 2012 [the Church hurries slowly, you know] in a letter at the home page of the IOR website [launched in June , 2012]:
Also from the Vatican point of view, the recent history of efforts at reform of the IOR:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_the_Works_of_Religion

1948: A Vatican official named Monsignor Edoardo Cippico was arrested and imprisoned for evading Italian currency controls through money-laundering operations at the Vatican Bank.

October 28, 1958: Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli elected pope, taking the name John XXIII.
Since his prime objective was a more ecumenical, in the fullest sense of world-wide, resulting in Vatican II, there’s no indication found about John XXIII dealing with the Vatican Bank. There is, however, a connection with its future president:
In December 1959, he [Msgr. Paul Marcincus] returned to Rome to work in the office of the secretariat of state, by which time he had learned enough Italian to serve as an occasional interpreter for Pope John XXIII. 
Marcinkus was toserve as president of the Vatican Bank from 1971 to 1989.

1968: In 1968 Pope Paul VI selected as the Vatican’s chief financial advisor a man named Michele Sindona, a well-known Mafia banker who was later convicted of fraud, theft, perjury, and murder. In 1973, Sindona engineered the sale of the Banco Cattolica del Veneto, which had previously been owned by the Vatican, to the Banco Ambrosiano of Milan. 

1971 - 1989: American-Born President of the Vatican Bank
Cicero-born, Msgr. Paul Marcinkus was the president of the Istituto per le Opere di Religione, also known as the Vatican Bank, from 1971 to 1989. As early as April 24, 1973, Marcinkus was questioned in his Vatican office by federal prosecutor William Aronwald and Bill Lynch, head of the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the United States Department of Justice, about his involvement in the delivery of $14.5 million US worth of counterfeit bonds to the Vatican in July 1971, part of a total request of $950 million US worth stated in a letter on Vatican notepaper.
For those not remembering, there's more at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Marcinkus

"You can’t run a Church on Hail Marys", he [Marcinkas] used to say; he certainly ran the bank – and a good many quite unrelated companies as well, one of which made the contraceptive pill – with firm efficiency.
He also maintained close contacts with Sicilian Mafioso banker Michele Sindona – with whom he was fellow director of a bank in the Bahamas, and who in 1980 was sentenced in New York to 25 years’ imprisonment on 65 counts, including fraud – and the chairman of the  Banco Ambrosiano (the ‘Priests’ Bank’) Roberto Calvi, whose body was found in June 1982 hanging under Blackfriars Bridge.

[See item below, 1982]

August 26, 1978: Cardinal Albino Luciani was elected Pope and takes the name John Paul I.
Luciani was known as a kindly man, but he was not a forgetful man.  Even if he had been, his memory might have been jogged when immediately after taking office he received a circular from Italy’s Office of Exchange Control warning of illegal activities involving transfers to the “foreign” Vatican Bank to violate the nation’s currency laws. According to David Yallop’s book In God’s Name: An Investigation Into the Murder of Pope John Paul I,http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=&l=as2&o=1&a=0786719842 Luciani quickly ordered an investigation of the Vatican Bank, and on the evening of September 28, 1978, after only 33 days on the job, he reviewed final drafts of documents approving sweeping changes, including the immediate replacement of Marcinkus. The next morning, Luciani was found dead. The changes at the Vatican Bank did not happen.

September 27, 1978: 
John Paul I dies 33 days after election 
Many will be familiar with the conspiracy theories surrounding JP I's death:
In short, there was plenty of motive for murder; plenty of opportunity; and plenty of suspicious circumstances. That is all we can say. There is absolutely  no conclusive proof of anything untoward, and John Paul I may have died a perfectly natural death. 
Those wishing to know more are referred to two remarkable books: In God’s Name by David Yallop, who believes the worst, and A Thief in the Night by John Cornwell, for whom this is all just another baseless conspiracy theory. Both are the results of deep and meticulous research, yet they reach diametrically opposite conclusions. 
The mystery remains.
1982: The most infamous publicity surrounded revelations about the Vatican bank’s dealings with Milan’s Banco Ambrosiano, one of the most high-profile bank collapses in Italy’s history. The Vatican bank was Banco Ambrosiano’s main shareholder. After its demise in 1982, Banco Ambrosiano’s chairman, Roberto Calvi, was found hanged under London’s Blackfriars Bridge. Prosecutors in Rome concluded that he was killed by the Sicilian Mafia but no one has ever been convicted of his murder.
Ocotober 16, 1978: Karol Wojtyla elected pope, taking the name John Paul II.
May, 1993:  During a visit to Sicily in May 1993, Pope John Paul II urged Roman Catholics, who make up the vast majority of Sicily's five million people, to rise up against the Mafia.
Mr. Coiro said the Pope's appeals were evidently viewed by the Mafia as breaching a kind of "non-belligerence accord" between Mafia and church. He said that in an apparent reprisal last September, the Rev. Giuseppe Puglisi, a priest in Palermo who was an outspoken opponent of organized crime, was shot and killed in what investigators believe was a Mafia operation.
And another retaliation is reported:
La Cosa Nostra didn't try to kill John Paul II — though Turkish gunman Mehmet Ali Ağca did try in 1981 — but it did apparently respond to his admonition by bombing several Roman churches a few months later, including the Basilica of St. John Lateran — the pope's home church, in his role as Bishop of Rome.

June 4, 2009: An AlterNet report cites:
The Vatican appears to have an enduring vocation for Italian political and financial scandal. Secrecy and intrigue were the order of the day when American archbishop Paul Marcinkus held sway in the Bastion of Nicholas V, the medieval tower housing the Institute for the Works of Religion (IOR), the Vatican's central bank.
More at: 

​June 12, 2012: An online new commentary states:
The Vatican Bank is under media fire as reports emerge that Italian prosecutors suspect it of laundering Sicilian mafia bosses’ riches.
​The Institute for Works of Religion, commonly known as the Vatican Bank, has so far refused to disclose details of an account held by a priest in connection with a money laundering and fraud investigation.
​ More at​

June, 2013:  A news outlet, little noticed in the world media, reported: 
On June 28 this year, Italian police arrested a silver-haired priest, Monsignor Nunzio Scarano, in Rome. The cleric, nicknamed Monsignor Cinquecento after the €500 bills he habitually carried around with him, was charged with fraud and corruption, together with a former secret service agent and a ­financial broker. All three were suspected of attempting to smuggle €20m by private plane across the border from Switzerland.
Prosecutors alleged that the priest, a former banker, was using the Institute for Religious Works – the formal name for the Vatican’s bank – to move money for businessmen based in the Naples region, widely regarded in Italy as a haven of organised crime. Worse still, Scarano (who, together with the other men, has denied any wrongdoing) had until only a month earlier been head of the accounting department at the Administration of the Patrimony of the Apostolic See, the treasury of the Vatican.

October 1, 2013: Vatican Bank [IOR] opens its books for the first time, According to a Reuters report:
The IOR said that in 2012 it had a net profit of 86.6 million euro ($117.23 million), more than four times greater than the 20.2 million euro profit in 2011.
The report, whose figures were audited by KPMG, said the huge increase in net profit was due mainly favorable trading results and higher bond values.
It said 54.7 million euro of the profit was transferred to the budget of the Holy See to help the pope carry out the Church's mission around the world. It also revealed the extent of the IOR's holdings in gold, coins and other precious metals (41.3 million euros), that it had a stake in an Italian real estate company, and received two inheritance properties worth about 2 million euros in 2012.
The bank's stated aim is to hold and manage money for Vatican departments, orders of priests and nuns, Catholic institutions and related entities, clergy and Vatican employees.

November 14, 2013: Money Laundering Crackdown
Pope Francis' crusade against corruption in the Catholic Church, including an overhaul of the scandal-scarred Vatican Bank, has put the new pontiff in the Italian mafia's crosshairs, according to two organized crime experts.
In May, the Vatican Bank, officially known as the Institute for Religious Works, issued its first-ever report on money laundering, an apparent attempt to improve
 its financial transparency.
The 64-page report details the Vatican's efforts to crack down on money laundering in  particular, though it made no mention of mafia connections. The report found six charges of "suspicious activity" within the past year.


March 21, 2014:  Pope Francis takes part in the annual vigil in Rome where families whose members’ lives have been taken by mafia violence.
The Pope thanked the victims for their testimonies and expressed his solidarity with them. He asked them to never stop fighting against corruption. After his speech, he spent several minutes greeting some of them personally.
About 700 people attended the gathering, on behalf of more than 15,000 victims killed by the mafia.
At that time, he addressed his words to the mafia:  
"We pray for you to change. We are asking you, on our knees. It's for your own good. This life you live now will not give you pleasure, it will not give you joy, it will not give you happiness. The power, the money you have now, from dirty 
deeds, from many mafia crimes, this blood money, you can't take it with you to the next life. Change. You still have time to not end up in hell. That is what awaits you, if you continue down this path.”
See the three minute video of the actual context at

June 25, 2014: Pope Francis’ condemnation of mafia mobsters and presence at the prayer vigil goes beyond the perpetrators themselves and was also intended as a message to the Church ranks, as well as organized crime [emphasis mine].  Some priests in southern Italy are still accused of turning a blind eye to the crimes of devout Roman Catholic mobsters, who contribute handsomely to Church coffers for the maintenance of churches and often place themselves at the head of religious parades in small towns. Father Don Ciotti, who is the head of the Libera organization, which combats organized crime and has organized the prayer vigil on an annual basis, stated that the Roman Catholic Church has not always given attention to the victims of the mafia and the presence of organized crime. However, many perceive the pontiff’s presence at the ceremony and stern warning as an extraordinary message to his priests in the south of Italy in encouraging them to choose a courageous path of opposition to the mafia.
Read more at
http://guardianlv.com/2014/03/pope-francis-condemns-mafia/#77tIYPhbVXhB4zDm.99

The condemnation of the mafia by Francis, while nothing new, carries with it a number of implications apparently ignored by commentators. What’s new and not to be minimized is the risk of violence against him, not for just this “excommunication” statement, but for his whole approach in the reform of the Vatican Bank.

This is not just an “Italian Affair.” A corollary of the choice of Francis to attend this vigil at this time—on the 19th annual event—can be seen in a context of papal calls to the world and Church about money and justice. True, attending the vigil in March, 2013, in Rome, Francis must have been moved by listening to the reading aloud of the names of 842 who have suffered violent deaths since 1893 at the hands of the mafia. The suffering of those families of victims in March, 2013, no doubt, prepared him to make an even bolder statement in Sibari in June, 2014.


III.         THE UGLY
SOME CORROLARIES:
WORLD-WIDE CONDEMNATION OF USE OF POWER
But the vision of Francis is more world-wide and his message is too. He is saying “Using power for violence is ‘excommunicable’! Such actions cut one off from the community of Jesus.” If the priests of Italy have turned a blind eye to wealthy mafia contributors to the maintenance of their churches, what of those in other parts of the First World who temper their messages to what will be palatable by their wealthy parishioners? The question that remains is whether the message of Francis about “excommunication” sinks in globally.

THE PARISH AND THE USE OF POWER   
And what of the Church’s own use of power to suppress discussion of topics people want to address in the Church? How many parishioners, moved by the treasure of Church social teaching, are met with the cautionary words of parish officials: “We wouldn’t want to get people upset with us, would we?”  And even social-justice-minded parish staff find themselves confronted by well-to-do parishioners who object to “too much of this social justice stuff” or “stick to the preaching the Gospel, Father!”

One wonders what would happen if the world’s population of Catholics—both conservative and progressive—might be moved to withhold the percentage of donations going to the Vatican Bank through their parishes. Could good people be upset to that extent at the injustice of “their” bank being used for laundering mafia money?  

THREAT TO THE POPE
Pope Francis’ statements against the mafia may be cause to fear a local threat on the pope. His courage in making statements like this has brought the threat of violence against his predecessors.

NOW WHAT?
No Eli Wallach’s Tuco teetering on a stool with rope around his neck as Clint Eastwood’s Blondie riding off into the sunset with the bags of treasure in his saddle bags.

The conclusion of this present epic makes one wonder how the early Church communities would have looked on all this. Perhaps the best conclusion is the one made by one commentator who put it this way:
Well, since we are talking about the church, here is the apostle Paul writing to his acolyte Timothy (1 Timothy 6:10): "For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. And some people, craving money, have wandered from the true faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows."




Monday, February 10, 2014

Bishops Advocating Civil Disobedience. . . Selectively

An interesting item from CNS linked below invites reflection: what if the Bishops advocated the use of civil disobedience by the faithful about other issues? Not just the narcissistic  one about the alleged curtailing of "religious freedom" by the administration, but others, e.g., about pursuing criminal charges against prelates who moved sexual predators around to different parishes rather than reporting them to civil authorities for criminal action, or internationally, about the justice issues related to U.S. Foreign and Trade Policy, like the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership Act favored by the administration--called "NAFTA on steroids." The hierarchy so often casts those dissenting about Church policy and calling for reform as "cafeteria cathollcs." Selectively advocating civil disobedience for some self-serving justice issues over others seems to place our church administrators in the role of "buffet bishops."

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/us-bishops-prepare-catholics-civil-disobedience-we-may-need-witness-truth-resisting-law

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

An Opportunity To Show We Really Are The Church

By now every one must have heard of the survey our Bishops are to be circulating among the people of their respective dioceses.
It was the express mandate by the Vatican to the chanceries of the world that they share the text "as widely as possible to deaneries and parishes" for their input. Some Stateside dioceses began quickly to move toward extending the consultation process into the local level. Others not so much. The Archdiocese of Hartford has had a link on its website for quite some time [along with the announcement of the installation of Archbishop Leonard P. Blair as the successor to Archbishop Henry J. Mansell on Monday, December 16, at 2 PM at the Cathedral of St. Joseph. We can talk about Blair’s role in the “investigation” of the LCWR later]. It’s interesting to note that the link leads to the Vatican Synod Preparatory Document without a “user friendly” survey format provided. You’ll see that link along the right column just a little below the picture of the new head of the  Archdiocese:
But this original Vatican Preparatory Document has value in providing background about why this survey is to be made available by each diocese to all the people.
Okay, I know Vatican documents are not the most engrossing reading.
More useful is the site giving the letter to the US Bishops from the USCCB Secretary Msgr. Ronny Jenkins along with a downloadable format of the survey questions:  
So if you want to cut to the chase, just go to that site to see the survey and make your responses.
So you figure “What’s the use? They never listen anyway.” But stop and think about this. When  has the whole Church—that is, the people of God, not just the hierarchy—been asked their opinion on anything? This step is historical and momentous!
I side with the comment by one reviewer. “WillS” at the survey site of NCR:
 I personally am a bit disappointed to the responses of my fellow "liberal" bloggers here. We have an option,  finally, to have some input, and yet we complain it's not perfect. Not what "should" be done. Get over it! Fill out the survey. The survey, while a little heady and long, provides a great opportunity to cast wide answers to the questions asked, so do it. If we don't respond because we think the answers will be watered-down by the bishops, we've created...and used the excuse ourselves. It is one of our tools to communicate our needs, something that we've been asking for forever. Use the tools, good or bad, and maybe the next one will be better. Don't give our bishops an excuse to dismiss us. Who would have thought the Vatican would be asking for lay input a year ago? Is this not , with all its faults, a move in the right direction?
And okay, the last time the Vatican sought an opinion from the faithful was back in the 60’s when Pope Paul VI followed up on the work of John XXIII in extending the Pontifical Commission of Birth Control to 72 members. And as we see from history, according to Wikipedia:
Paul VI explicitly rejected his commission's recommendations in the text of Humanae Vitae, noting the 72 member commission had  Cardinal Ottaviani, the commission's president and Bishop Colombo, the papal theologian).  Humanae Vitae did, however, explicitly allow the modern forms of natural family planning that were then being developed.

On the basis of that ill-conceived decision, many were disillusioned about Papal consultation with “the people.” [A significant contribution to the narrative of that history, Turning Point, by Robert McClory is available at http://www.amazon.com/Turning-Point-Control-Commission-Humanae/dp/0824514580

But then, this is not 1966. And a lot has happened—in Church and in our world—since then, significantly Pope Francis.

All I can say is that this is an opportunity to be part of history and a chance to express opinion on some very significant topics. A number of years ago, Call to Action marketed a T-shirts with the logo “We are the Church. What if we really believed it?” For my part, I’m responding. And in a follow up entry, I’ll be posting my commentary. Will you share yours as a comment on this site?


Saturday, March 9, 2013

A Response to the Blog by the Catholic League about SNAP

A classmate of too-many-years-ago-to mention forwarded me an email of the "Latest News Release" (in effect a blog) by William  Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights [CLRCR], titled, "SNAP Is in Panic Mode." SNAP is Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests.The full article is at:
http://www.catholicleague.org/snap-is-in-panic-mode/

Donohue's article is the kind of writing that just gets my dander up. And I'm not sure which I'm more upset about: the content of the CLRCR "news release" or the forwarding of this blog by my very intelligent classmate to our class email list. I was hoping that one of my class would formulate a commentary in response to the article. But since none have responded yet, I suppose I can start the discussion by sharing this with you—and them—in the form of an email response:

Aw, Bill, please don't be taken in by the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, which considers itself "more Catholic than the Pope" and might be considered the Catholic equivalent of the check-out counter rumors-gossip-innuendo magazine The Star.
Even just a quick perusal of the Catholic League's website tells the story. And the Wikipedia essay on the organization is equally enlightening.

The Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests is doing a great service. While I didn't care for SNAP's use of the term "dirty dozen" to describe "cover-up" hierarchy, I was glad to see that their staff offered this apology for their use of the term:
We sincerely apologize for offending anyone by using the phrase "dirty dozen."
We are a staff of three abuse victims working very hard to protect kids, help victims, expose wrongdoers and deter cover ups in a huge, powerful, global institution. We simply are incapable of monitoring how a 40 year old movie title translates into multiple languages and a slang expression.

That being said, there are so many important concerns facing the "administrators" as they enter the conclave.
For first-world cardinals, these include the flight from faith by younger Catholics, loss of confidence in the church, the clergy sex abuse crisis and how to handle such controversial social issues as the place of women, homosexuality, gay marriage, abortion, divorce and remarriage, and the decline in priests.
For cardinals from the developing world, social justice, poverty, environmental issues and relations with Islam and other faiths take centre stage. For both groups, the government of the church and reform of the Curia have risen sharply up the agenda. 

It's good to hear, even if it's just a rumor, that Cardinal George is active in comments about cardinals with a "past." You probably saw the news item in the Tribune.
source:

SNAP's comment:
In a new interview with the Chicago Tribune, Cardinal George says that Cardinals are ‘vetting’ one another on abuse and cover up. If he is correct about this – and we hope he is – we are encouraged. But such vetting should go beyond just likely papal candidates. It should be vigorously expanded to include all church officials.
source:

The point is that "It's about the children."

On the other hand, as the Wikipedia article indicates, the Catholic League's Donohue has a history of "defending priests against accusations of child sexual abuse."

If it comes down to a choice between SNAP and the CLRCR, for my part, the children win my support.

Sunday, March 3, 2013

It's About The Children, The Holy Spirit Knows


As we enter this period of "sede vacante" at the Vatican, a friend of mine shared an  "Open Letter" last week with our group.

Her message brought to mind the many forms of abuse and violence being revealed in the news about the actions of official members of the Church--especially in the sexual abuse of children over the years.

What she wrote moved me to send a "Letter to the Editor" at the Hartford Courant. That letter, admittedly a plagiarized edit of Judy's email with her gracious permission, was published March 3rd.
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/letters/hcrs-12758hc--20130227,0,5135814.story

Here is her email. My commentary follows it:
Dear Laity & Priests,
It is time. We have experienced over ten years of ongoing revelations of clergy sex abuse scandals involving the rape of children, the protection of pedophiles, and the conspiracy of cover-up by bishops around the globe.
We have a pope who, as head of the Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith, was the key person responsible for every abuse case reported.
We have Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahoney, clearly exposed in clergy sex abuse cover up activity, and now Scottish Cardinal Keith O’Brien whose resignation has been accepted early amid allegations by four priests of inappropriate behavior.
First, I would like to commend the four priests in Scotland for reporting to the Vatican their experiences. Those “inappropriate actions” were examples of abuse; sexual harassment at the least, perhaps assault—and definitely abuse of authority. It took great courage to report this man, and I am sorry for the pain it has caused them. It is the systemic dysfunctional clericalism within the Roman Catholic priesthood that has destroyed any sense of integrity that may have been present and more importantly prohibits any real integrity to flourish.
It is time for the laity and the priests to assume responsibility for our part in this disgraceful reality.
Our sin is complacency. But it can be forgiven quickly and sincerely if apologies are made, accompanied with action.
1.     Provide a safe and welcoming environment which encourages and even urges all victims of clergy sex abuse to come forward.

2.     Provide a safe and welcoming environment which encourages and urges all priests and seminarians, past and present, former or currently working, to come forward and name the bishops who violated them through sexual harassment or abuse.

3.     Recognize that within the priesthood there is a certain percentage of the population that is gay. Also recognize that while celibacy is a vow taken at ordination it is not necessarily a gift given or call heard by each priest. It is an unfortunate mandatory requirement at this time. Require any priests weather gay or straight, who are living double lives, to come forward. Let us tackle the issues of celibacy, homosexuality and sexuality and equality. It is time.

4.     Priests and Laity hold public rallies and press conferences proclaiming apologies to victims while holding signed letters and petitions to our bishops stating that we will not financially support the diocese until the following things occur:
a.     Public listing of all priests credibly accused by lay persons
b.     Public listing of every bishop reported of harassment or abuse by priests.
c.      Release of all records showing any cover-up of pedophiles or other abuses of authority.
d.     Full financial disclosure of the diocese
It is time.
The truth and only the truth will set us free! Be not afraid.
Judy Lorenz

Great rallying statement, Judy! You've provided material that could be edited down to 200 words as "Letter to the Editor" today for newspapers across the country seeking counterpoint to the saccharin-sweet "We'll Miss You" messages on "B16 End Day."

What are daunting are the various forms of inertia apparently plaguing even those who term themselves "progressive Catholics." With all the ubiquitous Catholic reform organizations around the world, one would think that the message of your "OMG!" would be heard "from the housetops" of the media in all languages. Seems the outrage of the progressive element even just here in the U.S. was missed in the poll results in the USA Today article "U.S. Catholics Split on Church Direction Under New Pope" on Feb 21st:
Looking back over Benedict's papacy, U.S. Catholics are overall pleased with the work he has done. However, his favorability rating isn't as high as its peak of 83% right after his papal visit to the United States in April 2008.
About 74% of U.S. Catholics polled express a favorable view of Benedict, 85, who served eight years as pope. Benedict was a staunch conservative when it came to church teachings, but brought about many technology changes to modernize the church. He tweets from an iPad, has a Facebook page and provides Vatican news from a YouTube channel.
Pope Benedict's ratings have never soared as high as his predecessor Pope John Paul II, who was rated favorably by 90% of U.S. Catholics in three separate Pew Research polls in the 1980s and 1990s.
U.S. Catholics are united on some fronts. Most give Benedict negative ratings for his handling of the sex-abuse scandal in the church. Among Catholics who say they followed news of the pontiff's resignation, 63% are displeased with how he addressed the sex-abuse scandal, while 33% give him positive ratings. These ratings are significantly more negative than in April 2008. [emphasis mine]


Seems those who want to respond to the "OMG!" and other calls for church reform have their work cut for them with those of the 33% as well with those other 4% who, I'm guessing, "don't know".


Seems those who want to respond to the "OMG!" and other calls for church reform have their work cut for them with those of the 33% as well with those other 4% who, I'm guessing, "don't know".
In addition to the children, there are so many voiceless who have suffered what Judy outlines in her email at the hands of the men in charge of the Church who see themselves as powerful and forget the message of the Gospel Jesus.

One cannot but wonder how all good Catholic people haven't risen up in an outrage and a call to action akin to that expressed in Judy's email. The Catholic Church—or better, the people of God—have certainly responded with outrage to past situations with action. 

The unfortunate alternative to inaction is the blessing for the Czar offered by the Rabbi in Fiddler on the Roof which we might apply to the new pope: "May the Lord bless and keep him. . . as far away as possible!" or at least far enough away to let God's Spirit truly have free reign. If the Holy Spirit were in charge and being heeded by our church administrators, the abusers of children and the other voiceless would have received justice instead of cover-ups. After all, as I always say: The Holy Spirit knows what she's doing!

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Media Release


B16’s RESIGNATION: REAL REASON REVEALED
ORDAIN WOMENVATICAN CITY –  February 13 - After an extensive attempt at a cover-up of a recent unprecedented reversal of church opinion by an erratic Benedict XVI, Vatican Secretary of State Tarcisio Cardinal Pietro Evasio Bertone today revealed that the recent “resignation” announced by Benedict XVI on Monday was actually a “coup” carried out by a cadre of the leading conservative cardinals heading the various dicasteries of the Vatican.

This unprecedented move by these Vatican officials was occasioned by a recent incident involving the Pontiff. Archbishop Georg Ganswein, the pope's  secretary, reported that a few weeks ago Benedict, having just finished his morning meditation, shuffled to his office and taking out a scroll of paper was seen scrawling letters on it with a jumbo permanent marker. Finishing his message, the papal secretary reports, the pope walked, more resolutely than usual, down the corridor of the papal residence to the elevator. Puzzled by the Pope’s unusual behavior, his secretary followed him, but he reached the elevator just as the doors closed.
“I’d never seen his Holiness quite so intense,” Archbishop Ganswein was quoted as saying, “he was like a man on fire!”

Ganswein, 58, and in very good physical condition, was able to get down the stairs to the ground floor quickly enough, frantically calling the Swiss Guard. But Benedict had already exited the residence and was walking down the steps to St. Peter’s Square holding up the scroll before a small group of pilgrims gathered there. Witnesses said the pope began greeting people with his typical grandfatherly grin, seemingly unconcerned about security as he began to shake hands with the the gathered pilgrims. One of the group taking pictures of the Basilica turned to see the Pope coming toward her and quickly snapped a shot of the Pontiff as he held up the scroll on which he’d written in English “Ordain Women!”

Witnesses reported the Pontiff appeared at peace with himself and relieved, before the Swiss Guard, with the help of Archbishop Ganswein, intervened and quickly began ushering him back into the papal residence.
One of the other Swiss Guards on the scene approached the woman who took the picture and demanded the camera from her. Witnesses said she appeared intimidated and readily surrendered her camera on the promise it would be returned to her. It was later determined that the camera’s memory card had been removed. And, once this was discovered, they could not locate the woman. Her whereabouts is still unknown.

But the picture was just released today to world-wide media.

For obvious reasons, this unprecedented demonstration by the Pontiff had not been made public at the time it occurred. But the release of the picture forced the Vatican’s hand, and Osservatore Romano reported today it had received information on Tuesday from an anonymous source that the woman, a progressive Catholic, had removed the memory card immediately after taking the picture knowing she's be asked to surrender the camera. She had immediately entered into negotiations with  leading international media about how the picture would be used.

Only now has Archbishop Ganswein revealed when his first suspicions had been aroused, saying, "Through the door, I could hear the Holy Father during his meditation speaking with someone he was addressing as “Holy Spirit.” Ganswein reported that it was a woman’s voice saying, “C'mon, Josef, do the right thing!”

Meanwhile, preparations are going forward to prepare the Sistine Chapel for the conclave.

Today, one Vatican official refusing to give a name for fear of reprisals reported seeing a distinctive white dove perched on the roof of the Sistine Chapel, apparently resting after several failed attempts to gain entrance to the building.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Learning About Guns Can Teach a Lesson

.22 Caliber Bolt-action Rifle


AR-15  
I last fired a gun back in about 1948 when i was 10 years old. My older brother--age 16--owned a 22 caliber bolt-action rifle. Sixty-five years in hindsight, I am grateful that he afforded me the opportunity to experience the power of a gun because I learned that I never need, now wanted, to own a gun ever again. Of course, he had  probably skirted the requirements about gun registration in Illinois, and our parents didn't know he had the gun. He had a "range" set up in the basement shooting into a thick stand of newspapers. I cringe to think what might have happened in that make-shift range and when he used a gun to shoot out street lamps in another town--for which he was fortunately only reprimanded and parents fined. What's happening today is much more than just teenage misbehavior ignoring both gun laws and parental authority. Laws exist today that need stricter enforcement. We've come a long way from that .22 rifle to AR-15s. And our society and culture has changed radically. Objections to gun restrictions based on an over-200-year-old 2nd amendment need to be tempered by a common sense application of that amendment to bipartisan solutions to the mass shootings proliferating in our day.